Brother Jacques (Novels of Paul de Kock, Volume XVII) — Background and Themes
Edition facts
This digital edition of Brother Jacques (Novels of Paul de Kock, Volume XVII) — Background and Themes is described by source-level measurements including 124,059 words, 9 hr estimated reading time, and 12 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Paris (France) -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
d given preference over several much more advantageous offers, for Edouard’s only fortune was the place which he occupied in one of the government departments, while Adeline had about fifteen thousand francs a year. But Mademoiselle Germeuil had no ambition, she considered happiness to consist in delights of the heart, and not in more or less wealth. Moreover, with fifteen thousand francs a year, one can live without privation, especially when one is the wife of a man of orderly habits, who knows how to regulate his household expenses. Now Murville seemed such a man, he seemed to have all the estimable qualities, and he carried the day.
Mademoiselle Germeuil had no parent but her mother, a most estimable woman, who adored her daughter and was never willing to thwart her desires. However, it was her duty to look after Adeline’s future welfare; and so, as soon as she discovered her daughter’s love for Edouard Murville, she made haste to seek information concerning the young man’s moral character, and concerning his family.
She found that he was born of well-to-do parents; that his father had followed the profession of the law with honor, but that several successive failures had reduced the family to the strict necessaries of life. Edouard and Jacques were Monsieur Murville’s only children. Jacques was a year younger than Edouard; but Madame Murville had not divided her affections equally between her two sons. Edouard was the favorite. A circumstance, apparently most trivial, had influenced Madame Murville’s sentiments; she had little intellect and a great deal of vanity; so that she was certain to set great store by all the petty, puerile things which are of such great weight in society. When she first became enceinte, she put her mind on the rack, to think what name she should give to her child. Her desire was to find a name which should be at once graceful, pleasant to the ear and distinguished; after long discussions and profound reflections, she decided upon Edouard for a boy, or Célénie for a girl, Monsieur Murville having left her entirely free to decide that question.
The first-born was a boy, and he received the name of Edouard, with all his mother’s affection. When she became enceinte again, she did not doubt for an instant that she should bring into the world a pretty little Célénie; the birth of a daughter would have filled her cup to overflowing. But after long suffering, she brought into the world a bouncing boy.
It will be understood that this one was not so warmly received as the first. Moreover, they had not had the slightest expectation of a boy, and they had not decided what name he should bear. But this time any previous deliberation upon that subject would have been wasted, for Monsieur Murville informed his wife that a friend of his desired to be his son’s godfather. This friend was very rich and they were under some obligation to him, so that they could not refuse him as godfather. So he held the child at the altar, and to the great scandal of Madame Murville, gave him the name of Jacques.
In truth, although Jacques is as good a name as another, it is not very melodious, and it offended the delicate ear of Madame Murville, who maintained that it was a name fit for a footman, a Savoyard, a messenger, and that it was a shame to call her son by it. In vain did her husband try to make her listen to reason, and recite to her again and again the history of Scotland, where the throne had been occupied by many Jacqueses. Madame Murville could never pronounce that name without a sigh.
However, there was no way to change it, for the godfather, who was naturally called Jacques also, and who came often to see his godson, would have been deeply offended to hear him called by any other name.
So the little fellow remained Jacques, to the great distress of Madame Murville. As for Edouard, whether from a spirit of mischief on his part, or because the name pleased him, he called Brother Jacques every moment during the day; and when he had done anything naughty, he always shifted it to Brother Jacques’s shoulders.
The two brothers were entirely different in disposition; Edouard placid, well-behaved, obliging, was glad to pass his day by his mother’s side; Jacques, noisy, boisterous, quick-tempered, could not keep still, and never went anywhere without turning everything upside down.
Edouard learned readily what was told him; Jacques would throw his books and pens into the fire, and make a hoop or a wooden sword.
The opening chapter of Brother Jacques plunges the reader into a wedding party at the Cadran-Bleu on the Boulevard du Temple, a setting that immediately establishes the novel's interest in Parisian social spectacle. The narrator directly addresses the reader, inviting them to observe the scene: 'Pause a moment on the boulevard, in front of the Cadran-Bleu; follow the example of those folk who look on at all the wedding parties.' This technique of drawing the reader into the crowd is characteristic of Paul de Kock's style, blending observation with commentary.
The excerpt reveals a narrative voice that is both intimate and ironic, reflecting on the gap between wedding-day hopes and later disappointments. The narrator muses on how the wedding ceremony 'saddens the young wife, but a few years married, who already has ceased to know happiness except in her memory.' This early passage sets a tone of worldly skepticism, hinting at the marital tensions and deceptions that may unfold.
A Narrator Who Intervenes
The narrator of Brother Jacques is not a neutral observer but an active presence who questions, explains, and moralizes. In the opening pages, the narrator asks directly: 'But, you will ask me, what is the occasion of this assemblage at the Cadran-Bleu?' and then answers, 'Better than any of these; it is a wedding party.' This rhetorical device creates a conversational tone, as if the reader is being guided through the scene by a knowing companion.
The narrator also offers cynical reflections on marriage, noting that orange blossoms 'have unhappily lied to more than one husband who has never boasted about it.' Such asides reveal a narrator who is skeptical of romantic ideals and attuned to the gap between public ceremony and private reality. This voice is a consistent feature of the text, shaping how events and characters are presented.
Gambling and Social Ambiguity
A substantial portion of the excerpted dialogue concerns gambling, specifically the 'academy' at number 9 in the Palais-Royal, a roulette establishment. The character Dufresne describes it as a place where 'the most fashionable people' gather, including 'many nobles who try their hardest to win the money of plebeians.' The conversation reveals a world where social boundaries are porous: merchants, brokers, and soldiers mix with chevaliers and viscounts, all engaged in the pursuit of fortune.
The dialogue includes a quotation from a 'favorite author' that praises gambling as a means to a life of ease, listing 'Gascons loud who sup at game-house board' and 'unribboned knights.' This embedded verse suggests that gambling is not merely a pastime but a theme that the novel treats with both fascination and moral ambiguity. The characters' casual discussion of 'martingale' systems and 'recouping losses' indicates a culture where risk is normalized and even celebrated.
Parisian Settings as Social Markers
The novel's settings are carefully chosen to convey social status and atmosphere. The Cadran-Bleu, a restaurant on the Boulevard du Temple, is presented as a venue for wedding parties and public display, where 'idlers, the loiterers, or the loungers' gather to watch. The narrator describes the scene at midnight, when 'the tableau becomes more interesting, more varied, more animated,' emphasizing the performative nature of Parisian social life.
In contrast, the Palais-Royal's number 9 is a gambling den that Dufresne insists is 'almost as respectable as Frascati’s,' a famous gaming house. The distinction between number 9 and 'number 113'—the latter reserved for 'workmen, the apprentices, and the petty tradesmen'—shows how the novel uses specific addresses to map the city's social hierarchy. These locations are not just backdrops but active elements that define characters' aspirations and risks.
Readers approaching Brother Jacques should attend to the narrator's direct addresses and the way they frame the action. The excerpts suggest a novel that is as interested in the manners and morals of Parisian society as in its plot. The catalog subjects list 'Brothers' as a theme, but the excerpts do not yet reveal which character is the titular brother or how fraternal relationships drive the story. The gambling dialogue and wedding party setup, however, indicate a world where appearances are carefully managed and where money and marriage are intertwined.
There’s a particular ache in Brother Jacques when the gambling tables swallow a family’s quiet hopes, that same helpless feeling that haunts Ourika — Context and Discussion. Both books know how Paris shapes a person from the outside, leaving the inner life to grow crooked or still. I still think about those characters sometimes, like old neighbors.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.